Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection (edit 92)

I'm continuing to work on editing Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection.

I'm still editing things to bring things in line with a full Bayesian analysis with an alternate hypothesis - essentially, the "x =" vs. "x >" issue. I've edited things down to "empirical evidence from the historical figures of antiquity".


You may next want to read:
My facebook post on Easter
The intellect trap
Another post, from the table of contents

Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection (edit 91)

I'm continuing to work on editing Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection.

I'm still editing things to bring things in line with a full Bayesian analysis with an alternate hypothesis - essentially, the "x =" vs. "x >" issue. I've edited the text and graphs down to chapter 11.


You may next want to read:
Christians, read your Bibles
Interpreting the Genesis creation story: an introduction
Another post, from the table of contents

Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection (edit 90)

I'm continuing to work on editing Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection.

I'm still editing things to bring things in line with a full Bayesian analysis with an alternate hypothesis - essentially, the "x =" vs. "x >" issue.


You may next want to read:
The intellect trap
The want of a mate
Another post, from the table of contents

Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection (edit 88)

I'm continuing to work on editing Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection.

I've made some changes towards the "x = " vs. "x > " change, and also made some clarification on probabilities vs. odds.


You may next want to read:
A record of the total solar eclipse
"Proving" God's existence
Another post, from the table of contents

Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection (edit 87)

I'm continuing to work on editing Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection.

I've pretty much decided on switching to the "x = " arguments, instead of going with the "x > " form. I think it'll be cleaner, with less back-and-forth and explaining of the various subtleties. As a bonus I may get a chance to explain the difference between Bayesian and frequentist approaches to problems like this.

I've made some changes to the text to reflect this, and started editing the jupyter notebooks. But things will be a bit messy for now.


You may next want to read:
Science as evidence for Christianity (Summary and Conclusion)
Can God make a rock so heavy that he cannot lift it?
Another post, from the table of contents

Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection (edit 86)

I'm continuing to work on editing Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection.

I added a graph to the section on "Assigning numerical x values". I'm also considering a fairly major restructuring, to do the Bayes factor at x = instead of x > 6 from the beginning.


You may next want to read:
The Gospel: the central message of Christianity (part 1)
The word "If" does not apply to God
Another post, from the table of contents

Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection (edit 84)

I'm continuing to work on editing Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection.

I made a graph describing the "meeting" vs. "exceeding" condition for a Bayes factor, under the "Using the historical data to construct the skeptic's distribution" section, and added a little bit more text there.


You may next want to read:
How is God related to all other fields of study?
Sherlock Bayes, logical detective: a murder mystery game
Another post, from the table of contents

Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection (edit 83)

I'm continuing to work on editing Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection.

I've adjusted a few more things to more precisely state the nature of the Bayes factors in computing the "skeptic's distribution". I now need to add two more graphs: one for more clarification on the x-axis in the "Assigning numerical x values" section, and another to describe the "meeting" vs. "exceeding" condition for a Bayes factor, under the "Using the historical data to construct the skeptic's distribution" section.


You may next want to read:
A record of the total solar eclipse
On becoming a good person
Another post, from the table of contents

Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection (edit 82)

I'm continuing to work on editing Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection.

I've adjusted things based on the new x-axis down to "Defining "outliers"". I still need to add a graph for more clarification on the x-axis in the "Assigning numerical x values" section.


You may next want to read:
Should we put the LORD our God to the test?
Can God make a rock so heavy that he cannot lift it?
Another post, from the table of contents